Some Preliminary Thoughts on How the New Testament Writers Quote the Old Testament
1 – The NT writers frequently quote OT passages.
2 – The audiences of the NT writers have varying familiarity with the OT texts.
3 – The audiences may have people that know the OT text quite well since there are probable Jewish converts in many of them.
4 – The NT writers are writing to critical audiences picking apart their words with discernment.
5 – If the NT writer quoted the OT in a way inconsistent with the OT, they could be called on it.
6 – The NT writers are trying to make a case for their own position.
7 – They were establishing their credibility – it was not a given like it is for us.
8 – The NT writers did not quote the OT in a way inconsistent with the text.
Jesus Quoting the Old Testament
Here is an example of Jesus quoting the OT.
Matthew 22:32-33 – [Jesus said] “‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.” When the crowds heard this, they were astonished at His teaching.
They were astonished because Jesus had so easily refuted the Saducees.
Even more striking was the choice of passage. This passage was the party slogan for the Pharisees.
How does this match the 8 principles listed above? Jews were convinced by the argument given. It was pursuasive because it was coherent to the Old Testament passage.
A Tougher One
A much tougher passage is found in Romans 9.
Rom 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
The immediate assumption is that this is referring to the historical persons Jacob and Esau. This page shows the context of the passage from the Old Testament. As the page shows, it is not talking about the individuals but about two groups. Jacob is representative of his descendents. Esau represents Edom. This is the context of the Old Testament passage.
How much of the Old Testament context matters? Doesn’t the New Testament determine the meaning? Point 4 above, makes this not as likely. After all, the apostles were quoting the Old Testament to support their position. If the Old Testament passage supported some other position then they were giving a bad argument. This is one case where the Old Testament does inform our understanding of the New Testament. In the case of the Romans 9 passage it is the imported presupposition that this passage is about individual election that causes the problem. The passage is about group or class election in the Old Testament usage.
Leave a Reply