{"id":130,"date":"2013-09-19T00:43:00","date_gmt":"2013-09-19T00:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/2013\/09\/19\/pv-of-the-bvm\/"},"modified":"2025-01-13T13:55:04","modified_gmt":"2025-01-13T13:55:04","slug":"pv-of-the-bvm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/2013\/09\/19\/pv-of-the-bvm\/","title":{"rendered":"PV of the BVM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For those with access to theological libraries, or who can get the document through the Theological Research Exchange Network, the thesis that I found was by William Essey and is dated March 1973. The title is \u201cMariology in the Fathers: Apostolic Era through Byzantine Synthesis\u201d. In the paper the author notes the influence of the Protoevangelium of James on the theology of St Clement of Alexandria (ca. 215) who then influenced Origen (c. 253). Here\u2019s the relevant quote from the thesis:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nAlthough not playing so great a role in the Mariology of the first three centuries, the \u201cProtoevangelium of James\u201d was known by some Fathers and planted the seeds which would bear fruit in a few generations. (p 10)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;He then proceeds to list the things that are found in \u201cthe apocryphal text\u201d including \u201creferences to her [Mary&#8217;s] ever-virginity\u201d. Thus, my central thesis, that the source of the dogma of the Perpetual Virginity of Mary rests upon the Protoevangelium of James finds support in the scholarly writings of St. Vlad\u2019s Seminary. In fact, I did a search of the thesis on file at the library and could find none that support a contrary position. However, there may be some that are not on file at the theological library.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><strong>NOTE: This is no longer my view.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For those with access to theological libraries, or who can get the document through the Theological Research Exchange Network, the thesis that I found was by William Essey and is dated March 1973. The title is \u201cMariology in the Fathers: Apostolic Era through Byzantine Synthesis\u201d. In the paper the author notes the influence of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theotokos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":532,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130\/revisions\/532"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglasgilliland.com\/theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}